Sunday, October 28, 2007

The Matter of Skin Color

I really hadn't planned on jumping quickly into debates over sensitive topics. My blog is new and I'd prefer to establish my identity here before I go running off into the blazing battles being fought by more tenured bloggers.

However, I can't help but contribute my .02 here. After all, so much about this issue has framed my world for as long as I can recall.

I was blog-browsing this morning and ran across this blog "The Black Socialite",which led me to the CNN article.

Ok, so here's what happened to, yet again, surface this debate/discussion:
A party promoter for a nightclub in Detroit decided it would be "brilliant" promote that the nightclub would, at this given party, allow light-skinned black women to enter free of charge. Thus, leaving darker skinned black women with the choice of paying for their own admission, or not attending the party.

Really, I can only imagine what this promoter was thinking. He's 27, so I think he should be old enough to understand that this would have opened some wounds and incensed folks. I wonder if he was thinking that it would get everyone talking about the party (negatively), and make the party more successful. Probably. I bet he didn't expect it to be debated on a National level. He should have.

So, as your might imagine, we're back to the age-old debate about skin tone.

Here's the history:
Some of the darker skinned African Americans are/have been claiming that the lighter skinned African Americans:
  • have it easier in the working world
  • are viewed as more physically attractive, more docile, more approachable, more agreeable
  • are guilty of feeling superior
  • have created exclusive clubs and lives that shun the darker skinned

Some of the lighter skinned African Americans are/have been claiming that the darker skinned African Americans:
  • Ridicule and tease, as children, about the lightness of their skin (i.e. calling names like :white girl/boy, sunshine, light-bright almost white, red-bone, Casper, half-breed etc)
  • Refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the "blackness" of the lighter-skinned
  • Accuse lighter skinned of trying to act "white" if they speak properly or have any white friends
  • Automatically assuming that the lighter skinned person thinks they are superior or more attractive, without getting to know the lighter skinned person

Forever, this has been going on.

Spike Lee dramatized the issue in his film "School Daze" .

Now, today, I find countless blogs where colorism is being discussed and what I am reading makes me angry.

What I find most interesting is the INTENSE anger being targeted at light skinned African Americans. I found one blog where people on both sides were contributing their comments and feelings...and then someone jumps in and suddenly starts bashing light skinned people. At first, I wasn't going to give this blog any credit because much of the responses are ignorant nonsense. But, I sat back and realized that these are real people. These people are in school with our children, sitting next to us in church, working next to us in the office. So, I suppose we need to address this at many different levels. Don't get me wrong, it isn't this blogger than concerns me...it's those who have responded here.

Some of the responses to that blog mirror what I read in another article this morning: African Americans who are mixed race, on any level, are asked to identify themselves as mixed, or mulatto, or something else....but not as black or African American. Really? We really want that?

Let's think about that for a minute. Here are the questions I'd like to ask those who support the idea of asking mixed-race African Americans having to identify as something else.

  1. At what point would we need to do that? How much white blood would I need to have in me to have to do that?
  2. What if I am half white, but my skin is dark and my hair is thick? Would I still have to identify as something else?
  3. Would there be a test of my skin to determine if I am dark enough to remain in the African American pool?
  4. How would the government address this? I suppose the millions of people who would move out of the African American pool would need to ensure that all grants, funding and programs that are aimed at bettering the lives of African Americans would split off so that we, who would leave the African American pool, would take our money and programs with us.
  5. I suppose that the groups, social clubs and organizations that support the African American community with funds raised would need to divide their membership and also redirect those funds so that there's an equal distribution into this new group of mulatto or whatever you want me to call myself now.
  6. Oh, and I also suppose that you won't mind that you, Ms Darker-Skinned-person-with-this-idea-to-split-the-race, might give birth to a lighter skinned child and your child might need to identify with a race that is not yours. That'd be ok too, right?

Really, people. In the words of my good friend (who is white & Cambodian mix) Rose O'Donnell, this is a bunch of "ridiculousness".

Here comes the rant:

I am very, very tired of feeling like I need to feel apologetic for having light skin, light eyes, light hair. Wait! Let me go on before you jump in...

I was raised in a middle-class home, the daughter of an attorney, who was/is also an Alpha. My family, for many generations, has been free, educated and talented. I grew up in Philadelphia and in the Caribbean,when Dad was in the Attorney General's office of the United States Virgin Islands. I still consider the Virgin Islands to be my second home and get down there a couple of times each year. Yes, this has nothing to do with skin color. Just framing my background for you. If you think skin color is an issue in the US, you should go to the Caribbean. It is beyond reason there.

Wait! It gets better and if you are made at me for being light, you're about to really get mad...

My late paternal grandmother, Helen Chase Gilbert, was a Charter Member of Jack and Jill in Philadelphia. Jack and Jill was founded in Philadelphia in 1938, so this was the very beginning of the group. Yes, I am a current member and my hope for my daughter is that she will one day be a member. As I sit in my monthly meetings and glance around the room, I am greeted with beautiful, genuine smiles of women(of all hues) who are setting the benchmark in their respective fields - and their skin tone and hair textures are as varied as the day is long. As a matter of fact,when I served as President of my chapter, our First Vice-President was a darker skinned sister with twisted, natural braids. She was also a leader in her community and had been afforded the office of President before I, but elected to decline due to the expanse of her community obligations.

My mother was also member of Jack and Jill, and was also a Toastie. Yes, the Toasties...that group may have, at one time, administered the Brown Paper Bag test. My mother speaks of the test with disdain. She, herself, didn't know anything about the test when she joined. She is very fair and administration of the test was probably not needed for her. Once she learned of the test, she was embarrassed about it. Her parents and siblings would have all failed that test! Mom left the Toasties.

Most interestingly, on my father's side of the family (the more bourgeois side), most everyone is very,very fair skinned with more European features and straight hair. My paternal grandfather's brother "passed" all of his life. He lived in Florida, while most of us were in Philadelphia. Interestingly enough, we did see him quite often. He always showed up to important family events (alone) and sent Christmas presents to us all - a crate of fresh,Florida fruit - one for each household. He never missed a Christmas. We loved him and we forgave him. When he died, we each received a simple, handwritten note from his daughter: "Please be advised that William Gilbert has passed away. Sincerely, The Family." There was no return address, no details on where he is buried, etc. Of course, if we wanted to find out, it wouldn't have been hard. We have his former address and I'm sure one our family historians has his Social Security number. I am also told that someone in our family has some old letters written by my great-grandmother, asking Uncle Will to "make a choice" between worlds. I guess we all know which world he chose. Also, before he died, he wrote a memoir of his life.

This is the wonderful thing about Blogging. I can ramble off track and nobody can complain or accuse me of straying off topic. After all, this is my Blog (smile).

Back to the topic:

I've written all of that detail above because I wanted to give you a true sense of my point of view. My family and I would probably be considered Public Enemy #1 to all of those who are just generally angry at light-skinned African Americans and anything we've done that you would perceive as elitist and exclusive.

That being said, those of you who are just generally angry at light-skinned African Americans need to check yourselves. Quit the "I am a victim" role and take a more positive approach to who you are and how you are perceived. Look at the darker skinned role models in our community - the government leaders, the politicians, the physicians, the artists, the activists, philanthropists, etc. Come on down to Miami in July and check out the thousands of ladies walking into the Jack and Jill National Conference - check them out and tell me if Jack and Jill is administering a Brown Paper Bag test. Visit web pages for our strongest organizations and check out the photos of the membership. Tell me if you think they've shut out the darker hued from membership.

Here's what I think. I think the problem is with you. I think you meet people who look like me and a 1-ton chip immediately appears on your shoulder. You start to size me up. You want me to prove how black I am. When I was a young teen and I was enrolled in a local tennis camp for the summer, some of the African American players started a discussion about whether or not I was really black. I had to answer a series of questions. I guess I was too young and too insecure to tell them to go take a long walk off of a short pier. So, I answered the questions. "Would you rather watch Good Times or The Waltons"? Well, truth be told, I preferred the Waltons. I was around 13 years old and there was no way my mother would have let me watch a grown-up show with adult content like Good Times. But, nonetheless, I wasn't black enough because I didn't regularly watch Good Times.

Situations like the above repeated throughout my adolescence. I recall asking my mother to allow me to attend public school for 9th grade. I was tired of private school and wanted to socialize with more African American kids. I was already in Jack and Jill, but I was looking for something deeper. My parents were supportive and I tested for and enrolled in one of the city's Magnet public schools. It was not pretty! I rode to school on the public trolley or subway. Girls would yell at me from the back of the trolley as I got on "whoa, it sure is BRIGHT and sunny out here today" or "Look, it's Casper the Ghost". Once I arrived at school, things weren't much better. Kids would break into my locker, threaten me in the halls, try to cut my hair, etc. I did have some good friends - across the color spectrum. But, there was a pervasive ugliness against me, because of my appearance, my diction and my clothes (as far as I could tell).

After that year, my parents decided that I needed to go back to private school. I did, and things were ok again. We had darker skinned and lighter skinned girls in private school and everyone got along. I don't recall the color issue coming up for the rest of my time in high school. Not in my school, anyway.

This brings me to wonder whether the skin color issue is much more pervasive outside of the middle and upper class.

I wonder if the "skin color" debate is really just a smokescreen for a larger issue: Class.

If you were a dark-skinned, successful, pediatric neurosurgeon living in Westchester County NY with your dark-skinned millionaire husband and your beautiful, dark-skinned children.....and your housekeeper was light-skinned, would you still hate her?

In the end, I am of the opinion that this issue remains relevant in our community only because we keep it relevant. There are powerful, admired, beautiful African American women across all hues. Likewise, there are ignorant, shameless women across all hues. Focus on skin tone, from anyone, is simply a fuel to further ignite the fire burning in this community. We cannot afford to divide! If you find that you have chip on your shoulder about ANYONE based on the color of their skin, then YOU have a problem that YOU need to correct. If you don't correct it, then YOU are guilty of pulling the community into a deeper state of disrepair.

And, if I am not black enough for you because of how I look, I cannot help you. I will not apologize or have any empathy for you.

And, as far as the whole light-skin and being black enough issue is concerned, I wonder how you would feel about my cousin, Michaela Angela Davis. Is she down enough?

A nice Salon article here (love, love Salon!!) Love that she's using the term "hybrid". Hybrid is cool, right? I really like that term.

As far as the party promoter in Detroit is concerned, it was a stupid publicity stunt. And, now everyone is fired up about this instead of larger issues on which we should be focused today.....such as, Child Abuse!

Here's a poem to get your mind back into a state of saneness:

Sisterhood

A room full of sisters, like jewels in a crown, Vanilla, cinnamon, and dark chocolate brown.

Now picture yourself in the midst of this glory As I describe the sisters who are part of this story.

They were wearing burgundies, maroon and all shades of grays.

Some had elegant hats and others hairstyles of different arrays.

With sparkling eyes and shiny lips, They moved through the room swaying their hips.

Speaking with smiles on their cultural faces, Their joyful laughter filled all spaces.

They were fashionable and stylish in what they were wearing, Kind sisters who were loving and caring.

You see, it’s not about how these sisters appeared, Their beauty was in the values they revered.

They were smart, articulate and well read, With kinds of Latin history stored in their heads.

Jugglers of professions, managers of lives, Mothers of children, lovers and wives.

Good hearted, reaching out to others, Giving back to the community and supporting our brothers.

All of these sisters struggled the path. Suffered from prejudice, endured the wrath.

But they brushed off their dresses and pushed on the door, And they came back stronger than they were before.

Now imagine if you will The essence and thrill,

As you stand feeling proud In the heart of this crowd.

A sisterhood of strong women today, Still out in front, paving the way.

A room full of sisters, like jewels in a crown, Vanilla, cinnamon and dark chocolate brown.

-Dr. Mona Lake Jones

5 comments:

D.Large said...

Hi Steff, just wanted to say thanks for visiting truthatlarge I appreciate your support. I hope you don't mind but I posted your first story on my site. I hope people that read your article will then visit your site. You made some excellent points in your remarks. I hope your time permits you to write other stories. God Bless

Kip said...

Hello Steff,

Thank you for visiting the website/blog (the intellectual mad house). You wrote a good article here, and it was well thought out and thought provoking. I will say this, that I feel that many black Americans and mixed race people (mulattoes) need to study the history of the one drop rule also called the one drop blood rule. The ODR (one drop rule) is responsible for why mulattoes (mixed race) were forced to be labeled black in the first place. The ODR came from the state of Ohio in the 1830s, it was not law but it was a social custom only. Some mulattoes were free people of color and other mulattoes were in slavery, it all depended on the white slave owner whom owned the mulattoes. Many mulattoes were the children of white slave owners. The free mulattoes inter married with each other and produce quadroons and octoroons. These mulattoes were endogamous thus becoming whiter and whiter each generation.

In 1910 the state of Tennessee passed the One drop rule, and made it a law on the law books of Tennessee, and then from 1910 all the way up to 1930 all states had passed a one drop law in their law codes. This forced many mulattoes who looked white to either join the white race or claim black. Many joined the white race and many decided to claim black. The result was that due to the mulattoes joining the black race and inter marrying with them this caused some descendants of these unions to have lighter skin. The other result was that due to many octoroon mulattoes joining the white race -- today about 74 million white Americans have detectable Sub Saharan African DNA marker (genes). There are 200 millions whites in America with about 74 million having black ancestry inside of them. That is about 30% of the white population. This was due to the octoroons and some quadroons intermarrying with whites.

I feel that in America people should be allowed to self identify as they please. In 1967 the case called the state of Virgina vs. Richard and Mildred Loving was brought before the supreme court. Richard was a white man, and Mildred was a black woman. They went to another state and got married, and then returned to Virgina. Some states had removed anti interracial marriage laws and this allowed the Lovings to marry. They were arrested, and charged with breaking the interracial marriage laws of the state of Virgina.

The supreme court ruled in their favor, and the supreme court removed anti inter racial marriage laws and the supreme court removed the one drop blood rule (ODR) from all American states that still had the ODR and anti interracial marriage laws on their law books (codes).

The ODR is socially enforced by many blacks and certain Liberal and conservative whites. I say that now that the government no longer enforces the ODR -- mixed race people can choose to self identify as they please. Why do certain people whom are black even care if some yellow skin, yellowish red, reddish white, or white mixed race looking person who has some black in them choose to identify as mixed race or multi racial? Is there a strong sexual attraction for lighter skin people by blacks who are dark skin and caramel skin brown? Is it because some feel that light skin makes one pretty and white blood makes one intelligent so it is better to keep them here and labeled black only? Is it because the phenotype (physical appearance) is very attractive? Is it because without all of these mixed folks certain blacks will feel their race is ugly and inferior? Is it because of Jealousy and envy?

Blacks know the embarrassing reasons for all of this. Also all of that talk about we all must get along regardless of skin tones has become tirelessly boring. This thing called get along regardless of skin tone has been said for over 70 years or more and look nothing has changed. So no one needs to use that lame expression all the time (once in awhile is ok but not all the time). As for the term mulatto, personally I am not offended by it -- as long as people are not trying to use it in a very offensive way like changing their voice tones to make the word mulatto sound funny or silly.
I used it because it is understood to mean a specific group that was once endogamous.

If a person wants to be called a light skin black or just black then let them identify black, that is their right, and if a person wants to be called mixed race and identify as mixed race so be it. It is their life.
Some mixed race people will identify black one minute and mixed race the next it all depends on the situation.

As long as mixed race people are among blacks who are less mixed race in phenotype there will always be tension, and mixed race looking blacks will in general be favored over darker skin blacks and over certain caramel brown skin blacks. Caramel brown skin blacks are mixed race also but to a lesser degree (lower admixture), but it seems to me that darker skin blacks don't harass and mistreat these type of blacks as much.

These blacks are more neutral, but when it comes to yellow skin, reddish yellow, whitish, and beige skin certain darker blacks and some caramel brown skin get angry, and show a strong dislike for these mixed race looking people. I feel it is partially because these mixed race looking people have a lot of European ancestry that shows up in their phenotypes. Some blacks want to lash out at whites but are afraid because whites still are strong enough to punish them with the law. So they take their anger out on light skin mixed race looking blacks.

My point is let people in America self identify how they please, some whites only have 5% or 10% native American blood in them and thus go around claiming to be Native American Indians even though they are 90% to 95% white. In a democracy people have a right to identify how they please.
We should respect their freedom of choice.

Well Steff, thank you very much for coming by the blog, and if there are certain questions it is alright to email me too.

Take care,

Anonymous said...

Good 2 see a Woman such as yourself speak The Truth!

Anonymous said...

Steff:

Don't U think it's past time that J&J, Links, etc. opened the doors [and hearts] of membership to Women of "Other" races as well?

I am a J&J member & my Mom is a Link...We're both pale [she moreso than I] & have obviously experienced colourism/racism from ALL sides of The Colour Divide...
Difference btwn. my Mom & I is that I've had to PERMANENTLY
"Pass" [because Blacks don't have to give "Special" Tx to Light-Skinned/Mulatto/Creole Folks anymore];
whereas my Mom, being in her 50's,
never had to "Pass"...

I LOVE being White; but, obviously, my past can't just disappear!
It's deep, sitting in a Jazz Club, being/perceived as "White" & remembering how EVERY note I'm hearing is "Black".

I say all this to say, that I hope MORE "Black Elite" Leaders like you
more aggressively tackle this issue as it can destroy the WEAKER families in Our Community.
It's a trip when you're @ Church w/your family, and this stuff creeps into our Familial Spiritual Life!...

PEACE!,

LSGH

Blogger said...

Steff's Reply to LSGH:

I don't understand your question.

You asked "Don't U think it's past time that J&J, Links, etc. opened the doors [and hearts] of membership to Women of "Other" races as well?"

And then you wrote "I am a J&J member & my Mom is a Link"

And you folowed that with "I LOVE being White".

So, you're passing for white, but you are a member of Jack and Jill? But, you state that it's time for Jack and Jill to open the doors to white women. If you are passing for white, and you are a member, it sounds like the doors are already open, right?

By the way, Jack and Jill does not deny membership to white women.

Jack and Jill is a private club. Membership is by invitation and each candidate moves through a selection process before becoming a member. There is nothing in any of the bylaws about the members being a certain race, or not.

I really don't understand your comment about J&J members opening our "hearts" to white women. Since when is that a problem?

I think you might be confused on a few things or your may have received incorrect information. If you are a member, you should already know the things I am telling you.

About the fact that you feel that you need to pass, that one really confuses me.

Why would you need to pass these days? If you care to share more about that with us, I will share your comments on the blog.

You wrote that you love "being white"...but you are not white. So, you cannot say that you love being white. You can say that you love pretending to be white.

I do not understand how you can love to pretend to be something you are not. I would hate myself every day. Then again, hating yourself might be why you chose to do it in the first place.